ROLLING STONE SAYS ‘OOPS!’ ON DEVASTATING RAPE STORY

JohnLandsberg
December 5th, 2014
Rolling Stone Magazine

As one prominent freelance writer notes, this is journalism that might go down in history along the lines of notorious frauds as Janet Cooke and Stephen Glass.

Or maybe Jayson Blair.

Rolling Stone magazine, which all but accused the prestigious University of Virginia as being a haven for rapists along with bashing fraternities across the U.S., is now saying “ooops!” on its devastating story.

The magazine has now issued an apology for a recent story it did on an alleged rape on the campus in 2012, saying they have now found “discrepancies” in their source for the accusations.

An example of one discrepancy is the fraternity had no events even scheduled for when the alleged rape took place. That would have been a fact easy to verify. It was also reported the rape occurred during pledging, but that occurs in the spring, and not the fall as reported. Again, a first-year journalism student would have been able to uncover that fact.

Women’s groups around the nation were up in arms when the story broke saying campuses were unsafe for women. Investigations began that all but called for lynchings of men on campus.

It was reminiscent of the Duke University lacrosse scandal that ruined lives in 2006 and was found to be completely untrue (LINK).

“In the wake of the report, students held protests over sexual assaults and UVA suspended all 31 fraternities and 16 sororities on campus,” reported NBC News. ”Officials last month apologized to Jackie and other victims of rape, and said they were creating guidelines for protecting women and curtailing underage drinking.”

However, USA Today and some pundits started to poke holes in the Rolling Stone story that quoted an anonymous “Jackie” as having been gang-raped in 2012. Writer Sabrina Erdely has now admitted she never even contacted any of the woman’s seven alleged attackers, which is Journalism 101 for any story.

Basically, “Jackie” and Rolling Stone were judge, jury and executioner on the story.

“In this case, the magazine erred egregiously by not getting at least a “no comment” from the alleged perpetrators,” says Dan Lybarger, a freelance journalist who has written for a variety of major publications during his career. “This bungled story has produced the worst of both worlds: It has tarnished the reputations of the innocent, and it has prevented rape victims from receiving justice.”

Here is the apology:

To Our Readers:

Last month, Rolling Stone published a story titled “A Rape on Campus” by Sabrina Rubin Erdely, which described a brutal gang rape of a woman named Jackie at a University of Virginia fraternity house; the university’s failure to respond to this alleged assault – and the school’s troubling history of indifference to many other instances of alleged sexual assaults. The story generated worldwide headlines and much soul-searching at UVA. University president Teresa Sullivan promised a full investigation and also to examine the way the school responds to sexual assault allegations.

Because of the sensitive nature of Jackie’s story, we decided to honor her request not to contact the man she claimed orchestrated the attack on her nor any of the men she claimed participated in the attack for fear of retaliation against her. In the months Erdely spent reporting the story, Jackie neither said nor did anything that made Erdely, or Rolling Stone’s editors and fact-checkers, question Jackie’s credibility. Her friends and rape activists on campus strongly supported Jackie’s account. She had spoken of the assault in campus forums. We reached out to both the local branch and the national leadership of the fraternity where Jackie said she was attacked. They responded that they couldn’t confirm or deny her story but had concerns about the evidence.

In the face of new information, there now appear to be discrepancies in Jackie’s account, and we have come to the conclusion that our trust in her was misplaced. We were trying to be sensitive to the unfair shame and humiliation many women feel after a sexual assault and now regret the decision to not contact the alleged assaulters to get their account. We are taking this seriously and apologize to anyone who was affected by the story.

Will Dana
Managing Editor

2 Responses

  1. DR. Ernest Evans says:

    A DISASTER FOR REAL ISSUE
    Dear Mr. Landsberg: Thank you for posting this item. Rolling Stone’s unprofessional journalism in this case promises to be as much a disaster for the very real issue of campus sexual assault as Al Sharpton’s cynical exploitation of incidents like the Ferguson shooting promises to be for the very real issue of young black men being the victims of homicides. May God save young college women and young black men from all of their “friends” in the political class. Sincerely, Respectfully and In Christ, Ernest Evans

  2. ADB says:

    ARTICLE A COMPLETE CROCK
    One thing that always bothered me about Sabrina Erdely’s Rolling Stone article was Jackie’s story at the university pool. She said that 2 weeks after the alleged gang rape, “Drew” came up to her and said, “I wanted to thank you for the other night…I had a great time.”

    1) Who says that nonchalantly after they’ve gang raped someone? That’s insane and unbelievable.
    2) If “Drew” were real and had concocted a pre-meditated gang rape at Phi Psi, why would he choose a co-worker who he could potentially bump into tomorrow? And who also could rat him out to their co-workers and their boss?
    3) Jackie was a lifeguard at the pool, so most likely she had to wear a swimsuit for work. If she was badly beaten and bruised, wouldn’t someone have noticed that on her body? Wouldn’t that cause red flags and questions, which would then lead to someone finding out that she was gang raped at the behest of their co-worker?

    The entire Rolling Stone article sounds like a complete crock to me. Shame on them!

Leave a Reply