WHITLOCK RIPS POSNANSKI OVER PATERNO BOOK

JohnLandsberg
August 27th, 2012
Paterno

It really should not come as a major surprise that Fox Sports columnist Jason Whitlock has brutally ripped on former co-worker Kansas City Star columnist Joe Posnanski in a very personal and mean-spirited attack.

A reporter at the Star once noted that “Jason Whitlock has all the attributes of a dog, except loyalty.” He has again proved it.

Since leaving the Star a few years ago Whitlock has virtually ripped apart every editor and co-worker he ever worked with.  He was fired from both sports talk stations in Kansas City. ESPN fired him. He went on an afternoon sports talk show in KC and discussed an affair by a former editor.  It was cringeworthy. It was unprofessional.

At the Kansas City Star there were two sports columnists.  One was Joe Posnanski, who won just about every sportswriting honor ever given.  He left after nearly 13 years for Sports Illustrated, which is considered Mecca for sportswriters.  In April he took an even bigger job at a new joint venture between USA Today and Major League Baseball Advanced Media.

The other Star columnist was Whitlock, who during his 16 years at the McClatchy-owned paper tried to parlay race into virtually column, was suspended for making a gay slur during an NFL game, and had the reputation of being lazy and sloppy. Earlier this year he was forced to publicly apologize for a racial slur aimed at basketball’s Jeremy Lin.

According to blogger Greg Hall, who worked with Whitlock at the Star, “Whitlock resented that JoPo was presented as the polished writer while he felt he was thought of as the lucky black guy.”

Posnanski, who was named the Best Sportswriter in America in 2012 by the National Sportswriters and Sportscasters Hall of Fame, was with Paterno and his family as a the horrific national scandal unfolded at Penn State and Paterno was fired. Within three months, Paterno died of lung cancer.

When writing a book about Paterno Posnanski had the easy option of following the lynch mob who wanted to demonize the legendary coach for not doing enough to stop child molestations by a coach on his staff.  Or Posnanski could try to do an honest assessment of Paterno’s life and also examine the horrific ending where he was fired and buried a short time later.

In a review of Posnanski’s book Whitlock’s lede pretty much summarizes his feelings:

“One thing is obvious after reading “Paterno,” the much-anticipated biography chronicling disgraced Penn State coach Joe Paterno: The biographer doesn’t know his subject,” wrote Whitlock.

That may have been the most positive thing Whitlock wrote about his former co-worker as Whitlock managed to even bring race into the picture.

“(the book) expose(s) how a coach and a writer can sacrifice their integrity over time, one compromised decision at a time.”

“Seriously, most puddles are deeper than “Paterno.”’

“Paterno” reveals far more about the biographer than the subject.”

“The book had one other discernible goal — distancing Posnanski from his journalistic cowardice and fraudulence.”

Now Whitlock can add Posnanski to the list of folks he has stabbed throughout his career.  In this case, it is obvious jealousy is an ugly vice.

 

 

 

 

 

 

7 Responses

  1. Dan Lybarger says:

    CO-WORKER ISSUE
    Interesting to note that Whitlock doesn’t disclose that he and Posnanski are former co-workers. That sort of thing should have been admitted near the lead.

  2. harwood benjamin says:

    LONG HISTORY OF JEALOUSY
    Whitlock will have trouble being heard on this issue because of his long history with and jealousy of Posnanski. (He doesn’t get into it in his column, but speaks about it at length in the podcast he posted about this with stefan fatsis.) But even taking into account jason’s envy of joe, his review is on-target.
    Put aside the issue of whether Posnanski is an apologist for paterno. The book is not the promised definitive biography of Paterno–it is a rush job, hurriedly assembled, and without the legwork necessary to have lasting value. Joe must have believed that all he needed was unprecedented access to Paterno. But that should have been merely the first step in a long process.

  3. Rick Nichols says:

    WHITLOCK NEEDS TO TAKE OFF DIAPERS
    I know it’s asking a lot, but Mr. Whitlock needs to take off the diapers, grow up and move on. And hey, I’m sure there’s an orchestra out there somewhere that’s still looking for a second fiddle. Envy. One of the seven deadly sins.

  4. Scott Simon says:

    JOPO VS. WHITLOCK
    Posnanski on his worst day is better than Whitlock on his best day.

  5. JohnG says:

    WHO?
    Jason who?

  6. The Word says:

    JOPA A HACK
    Good for Whitlock for finally calling out JoPo on his sappy, sugary candy garbage. This book on Paterno is showing the sports world what JoPo really is…a hack.

    JoPo was not a good columnist. Yes, he’s a good writer, but he was not a good columnist. He would right long, overblown columns that didn’t say anything of substance. JoPo was and is a feature writer. Talk about the good stuff in sports. Tell people what they want to hear instead of what they need to hear. Have quotes about conversations he had no excess too.

    JoPo’s book is being bashed. It’s the worst book out there now.The man won’t do interviews for those who won’t kiss his rear. He’s now the laughing stock of the sports world.

    JoPo is a hack….sorry.

  7. Joe Charles says:

    ASSUMING WHITLOCK CAN READ
    Everyone seems to assume that Whitlock actually read the book. Can someone verify that?

Leave a Reply