TRUMP VICTORY OFFICIALLY BURIES PRINT MEDIA

JohnLandsberg
November 7th, 2016
RIP Newspapers

The entire status of the news media has been disintegrating over the past decade, but this year’s Presidential election truly signals the death knell of it, and in particular, print journalism.

As a former journalist and long-time communications professional, it is tough to read story after story of major layoffs at newspapers.  A recent study noted that the number of full-time journalists employed today is about half as many who were employed in 2000.

Sadly, after the election many major papers are already gearing up to lay off even more. The news “product” has declined dramatically while newspapers have continued to hike prices and slash pages in an attempt to squeeze more revenue out of a smaller customer base.

In past elections, candidates lived or died whether they received key newspaper endorsements.

However, in this election, Donald Trump acted as if he didn’t care if any newspaper endorsed him, and few did.  In fact, more than 240 editorial boards endorsed Hillary Clinton.  Trump was only able to garner 19 (63 didn’t like either candidate and endorsed none).

Obviously, that huge disparity really had no real impact on his campaign.  In fact, he berated the news media at every turn to the delight of his audiences.

The New York Times, the standard-bearer in the past for steadfast Journalism, went above and beyond in blasting Trump. It even ran a two-page spread highlighting Trump insults.  It made no difference.

The prestigious Columbia Journalism Review provided a harsh criticism of the lackluster coverage of the Trump campaign. While journalists attacked Trump personally they completely overlooked why people elected him President:

“Its inability to understand Donald Trump’s rise over the last year, ending in his victory Tuesday night, clearly stand among journalism’s great failures, certainly in a generation and probably in modern times.”

CBS columnist Will Rahn chastised his colleagues for their biased support of Clinton while mocking Trump supporters noting “This is all symptomatic of modern journalism’s great moral and intellectual failing: its unbearable smugness.”

Even worse, as more and more newspapers whittle down their staffs by dumping veteran journalists to cut costs, stories of reporters working directly with political campaigns were leaked daily.  Media credibility is now the lowest in decades with only 6% of Americans saying they have confidence in the media (Link) to tell the truth.

Articles such as the one in Rolling Stone magazine titled “A Rape on Campus” that falsely accused the University of Virginia administration and male students of covering up sexual assaults was a travesty.  A recent verdict against the magazine is likely just one on a series of financial hits it will take for printing a totally unverified story.

Newsweek actually shipped thousands of copies of its magazine heralding Hillary Clinton as the new president on its cover to outlets.  It is reminiscent of the embarrassing “Dewey Defeats Truman” front page of the Chicago Daily Tribune in 1948.

In a 24/7 news cycle, newspapers are left in the dust.  During Hurricane Andrew, the Island Packet, the McClatchy-owned paper covering Hilton Head, SC and the surrounding areas, didn’t even deliver a paper for several days during the devastation.

These are ominous times for print media, and it is likely many more newspapers and magazines will be closing their doors in the years to come.  And when the dust settles they only have themselves to blame.

wiki

 

The media often looked the other way as WikiLeaks revealed devastating information about the Clinton campaign.  Rather than investigate the hundreds of emails many media outlets simply ignored them.

Rather than change with the times to deliver news better and faster, they decided to try and cut their way to profitability. It is a scenario doomed to failure.

This election dramatically proved newspapers today are as useful as buggy whips after the invention of the automobile.

 

 

 

 

 

 

One Response

  1. Kevin says:

    SILENCING OPPOSITION
    The media and the academics only do this introspection when it’s desired outcome is not achieved.

    They’ve been able to silence their opposition in the public square by labeling people racists, mysoginists, and uneducated, but they’ve not quite figured out a way to shame them as they cast their vote.

Leave a Reply

  • COURIC TRICK SHOWS VALUE OF RECORDING INTERVIEWS

    It has been called “appalling journalism.”

    That might be considered a positive comment regarding an editing trick inserted into a documentary on gun ownership that has come to light.

    Long-time NBC Today Show star and anchor at all three major networks, Katie Couric, now with Yahoo! News, is being severely criticized for highly questionable editing in her documentary titled “Under the Gun” after it was revealed an eight-second pause was inserted to make it look as if the people interviewed could not answer her question (LINK).

    Luckily for the individuals being interviewed, one person was wise enough to record the Q&A (LINK TO AUDIO). Otherwise, questioning the bubbly media icon would have been virtually impossible and fruitless.

    Couric was executive producer, host and narrator of the piece.  Anti-gun activist Stephanie Soechtig produced and directed it.

    In the documentary, a group of Virginia gun owners was asked by Couric: “If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a gun?”

    Not only did Couric/Soechtig insert a pause (8-10 seconds), but they also inserted “B” roll of the gun owners taken before the interview even began.  There is little doubt the editing was clearly designed to make it look as if Couric’s tough question made them speechless and uncomfortable.

    Couric is now calling the edit an “unnecessary mistake,” according to an individual with knowledge of her thinking (LINK).

    In an official statement, Soechtig countered, “my intention was to provide a pause for the viewer to have a moment to consider this important question before presenting the facts on Americans’ opinions on background checks. I never intended to make anyone look bad and I apologize if anyone felt that way.”

    Couric now says she supports Soechtig’s statement “and am very proud of the film.” However, a few days later she admitted she regretted how she portrayed gun activists (LINK).

    However, the National Review and Washington Post now say Couric should be fired over the deliberate misrepresentation (LINK).

    This is a classic reason why at Bottom Line Communications we strongly advise clients to always record media interviews.  Without actual audio evidence (below) the Yahoo! crew would have denied inserting the pause.

    However, with the evidence journalism takes another huge credibility hit.

     

    Published May 29, 2016 at 8:30 am - 2 Comments It has been called “appalling journalism.” That might be considered a positive comment regarding an editing trick inserted into a documentary on gun ownership that has come to light. Long-time NBC Today Show star and ...

  • MIZZOU NEEDS CRISIS PLAN TO RESTORE IMAGE

    In Journalism circles, having a degree from the University of Missouri was often a ticket for success. It is not only the nation’s oldest Journalism school, it is also one of the most prestigious.

    When rankings for the best “J” schools in the nation are posted the University of Missouri is almost guaranteed to be in the Top 10 or Top 5.  However, that may have all changed due to the actions of a single media professor during the recent student uprising at the school.

    A Mass Media Professor, Melissa Click, is shown in a video asking for “muscle” to remove a student photojournalist, Tim Tai,  who was working for ESPN and in a public place.   It is a horrible act by a college professor and shows a total disregard for the Journalist’s First Amendment rights, which is against what the school has taught for decades.

    “Who wants to help me get this reporter out of here? I need some muscle over here,” says Click.

    A video of Click’s actions against Tai has gone viral and has well over 500,000 views (LINK) on a single site.  The New York Times has written an extensive story about her actions.

    What was once a sympathetic media for the protesters has now changed with the actions of students and faculty against them.

    Technically some have pointed out Click works in the Mass Media Division of the Department of Communications in College of Arts & Sciences, which is separate from the J-school.  However, she is listed on the School of Journalism’s site (LINK), which tars the entire Journalism program whether it deserves it or not.

    Click had earlier Tweeted out that she she was looking for coverage of the event by Journalists.  Later on she is clearly leading the charge against other Journalists with total disregard for their rights to cover the event.

    With the resignation of the school’s President and Chancellor the University of Missouri is clearly being painted as a college where the inmates are running the asylum.   Rather than act like a Professor, Click and other faculty members have clearly shown they were behind the student protests against the administration.

    If the University of Missouri doesn’t hire a crisis communications team immediately its entire image for producing quality Journalism graduates could likely be tarnished forever. If the school was wise it already had a crisis communications plan in place for such an incident, but that is unlikely.

    The first move would be to remove Click. But that would be a stop-gap measure since a faculty member helping foment the disturbance was an indictment on all the faculty.  The school hired her, and whether tacitly or not, approved of her actions.

    A statement issued today by the Dean of the Journalism School denied she was part of the faculty and sounded as if her days as a professor at Missouri were numbered. Click has also been forced to apologize in an attempt to save her job and resigned her “courtesy” appointment to the J-School.

    However, a Kansas City reporter told BLC that the protesters are refusing to speak with local reporters and will only do interviews with national media outlets.  That is the kind of move that will turn sympathetic local media against them now and in the future.

    It’s a bad move.

     

     

    Published November 10, 2015 at 10:23 am - 5 Comments In Journalism circles, having a degree from the University of Missouri was often a ticket for success. It is not only the nation’s oldest Journalism school, it is also one of the most prestigious. When rankings for the best ...